H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Steffi Graf H2H: 0-1

Steffi Graf holds a 1–0 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steffi Graf leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Steffi Graf won the 1997 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Steffi Graf
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Steffi Graf #2 6-3 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #124 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Steffi Graf #3 #1 5,028 2,600 866 109 88.8% 22 17 5 12 50 106

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Steffi Graf
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1982 2–4 33.3% — 1,507 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,546 0 0
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 1984 17–13 56.7% #22 1,747 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1985 40–13 75.5% #6 2,037 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1986 63–6 91.3% #3 2,329 0 8
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1987 70–2 97.2% #1 2,505 1 19
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1988 68–3 95.8% #1 2,535 5 29
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1989 85–2 97.7% #1 2,584 8 43
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1990 72–5 93.5% #1 2,510 9 53
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1991 64–8 88.9% #2 2,418 10 60
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1992 61–6 91.0% #2 2,448 11 68
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 1993 77–5 93.9% #1 2,510 14 78
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 1994 58–6 90.6% #1 2,417 15 85
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 1995 48–2 96.0% #1 2,466 18 94
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 1996 51–4 92.7% #1 2,446 21 101
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 1997 16–4 80.0% #28 2,353 21 102
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 1998 33–9 78.6% #9 2,284 21 105
30 — — — — — — — 1999 34–9 79.1% #3 2,242 22 106