H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 4-2

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 4–2 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2008 Doha third round 7-6(7) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 21, 2008* Doha WTA 1000 R32 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #101 7-6(7) 7-5 Amélie Mauresmo #22 Match data
Aug 5, 2004* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-4 1-6 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #50 Match data
Sep 2, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-2 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #39 Match data
Mar 8, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #8 6-3 5-7 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #32 Match data
Jan 20, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #9 7-6(3) 6-1 Tamarine Tanasugarn #25 Match data
Jul 1, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #31 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4