H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 5-0

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 5–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2002 Filderstadt quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 2002* Filderstadt WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-3 6-4 Tatiana Panova #21 Match data
Oct 4, 2002* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #7 6-4 6-3 Tatiana Panova #20 Match data
Aug 22, 2002* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #9 6-2 6-2 Tatiana Panova #23 Match data
Feb 9, 2001* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #19 6-4 6-2 Tatiana Panova #32 Match data
Oct 17, 2000* Linz WTA 500 R32 Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #16 6-7(6) 7-5 3-0 (ret.) Tatiana Panova #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0