H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Amélie Mauresmo vs Yayuk Basuki H2H: 0-2
Yayuk Basuki holds a 2–0 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yayuk Basuki leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yayuk Basuki won the 1998 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
INA
Age 55
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Yayuk Basuki | 6-3 6-4 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1998* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Yayuk Basuki | 7-5 7-6 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
| Yayuk Basuki | #262 | #19 | 1,360 | 1,940 | 161 | 123 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amélie Mauresmo | Yayuk Basuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,853 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 | 1997 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,707 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,660 | 0 | 6 |