H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 4-8

Conchita Martínez holds an 8–4 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 6–4 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2003 Zurich round of 32 4-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 8
12 main-draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Frazier #75 4-6 6-4 6-1 Conchita Martínez #13 Match data Oct 16, 2003* R32 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Conchita Martínez #8 6-3 6-1 Amy Frazier #24 Match data Apr 21, 2001* QF Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Conchita Martínez #7 6-3 2-6 6-3 Amy Frazier #19 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Amy Frazier #20 4-6 6-4 6-2 Conchita Martínez #14 Match data Oct 7, 1999* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Conchita Martínez #7 7-6 6-4 Amy Frazier #77 Match data Aug 20, 1998* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Conchita Martínez #11 6-1 6-1 Amy Frazier #35 Match data Jul 25, 1997* R16 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amy Frazier #26 6-4 7-6 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data Aug 13, 1994* QF Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Conchita Martínez #4 6-3 6-0 Amy Frazier #48 Match data Jan 23, 1994* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Conchita Martínez #4 6-2 6-4 Amy Frazier #53 Match data Nov 13, 1993* SF Philadelphia Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Conchita Martínez #5 6-1 6-0 Amy Frazier #81 Match data Sep 2, 1993* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Conchita Martínez #9 6-4 6-4 Amy Frazier #28 Match data Jan 10, 1992* R16 Sydney International Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amy Frazier #27 1-6 6-4 6-2 Conchita Martínez #9 Match data Feb 26, 1990 R16 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Conchita Martínez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3%
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
Career — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 34/138 of Amy Frazier's and 18/135 of Conchita Martínez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amy Frazier Conchita Martínez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
30 2003 4/27 1.0 7.0 57.0% 59.8% 36.6% 49.3% 62.5% 49.5% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 9/52 1.4 8.3 61.0% 61.2% 46.0% 41.9% 48.0% 55.3% 48.1% 2003 10/50 1.5 3.6 58.2% 62.7% 46.9% 50.8% 52.5% 55.9% 49.1%
32 2005 6/34 0.8 7.2 60.1% 58.3% 35.6% 43.8% 42.1% 49.2% 47.8% 2004 4/37 3.0 3.8 57.1% 64.2% 49.7% 52.7% 37.0% 58.0% 42.7%
33 2006 15/25 1.3 6.9 55.9% 60.7% 44.1% 51.4% 50.8% 53.1% 41.9% 2005 4/48 2.3 3.3 60.9% 58.0% 45.4% 59.9% 60.8% 52.9% 44.2%
Career — 34/723 1.2 7.3 58.1% 60.3% 42.2% 47.3% 49.9% 52.6% 44.8% — 18/955 2.0 3.6 58.6% 62.0% 47.2% 53.2% 50.9% 55.7% 46.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Conchita Martínez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57
17 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -75 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51
18 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28
19 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 1991 2076 163.5 — — — — -95 +132 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74
20 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06
21 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51
22 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 1994 2065 167.5 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84
23 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30
24 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86
25 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78
26 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 1998 1968 163.0 — — — — -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15
27 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 1999 1898 159.2 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25
28 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60
29 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48
50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.