H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Amy Frazier vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 4-8
Conchita Martínez holds a 8–4 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 6–4 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2003 Zurich third round 4-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
8
12 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2003* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Amy Frazier | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2001* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Conchita Martínez | 6-3 6-1 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2000 | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1999* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Amy Frazier | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
| Aug 20, 1998* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 7-6 6-4 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1997* | Stanford | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-1 6-1 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1994* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Amy Frazier | 6-4 7-6 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
| Jan 23, 1994* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-3 6-0 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Nov 13, 1993* | Philadelphia | WTA 1000 | SF | Carpet | Conchita Martínez | 6-2 6-4 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1993* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-1 6-0 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1992* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-4 6-4 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1990* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Amy Frazier | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | #450 | #13 | 1,381 | 1,959 | 416 | 307 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amy Frazier | Conchita Martínez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #58 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #33 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1990 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1991 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1992 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #19 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 1993 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #39 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 |
| 21 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 |
| 22 | 1995 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,835 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 |
| 24 | 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 |
| 25 | 1998 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 |
| 28 | 2001 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 |
| 29 | 2002 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #39 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2003 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #61 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 31 | 2004 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #26 | 1,828 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 32 | 2005 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 |
| 33 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,626 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 |