H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 0-2

Hana Mandlikova holds a 2–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1989 Los Angeles fourth round 6-1 0-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Hana Mandlikova
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 11, 1989* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Hana Mandlikova #18 6-1 0-6 6-2 Amy Frazier #39 Match data
Jan 13, 1989* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Hana Mandlikova #29 6-3 7-5 Amy Frazier #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Hana Mandlikova #31 #3 157 2,299 516 191 73.0% 4 0 0 3 18 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Hana Mandlikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1978 22–8 73.3% — 1,750 0 1
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1979 36–14 72.0% — 1,985 0 5
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1980 76–17 81.7% — 2,230 1 11
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1981 56–24 70.0% — 2,108 2 14
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1982 35–19 64.8% — 1,998 2 14
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,977 2 14
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,081 2 19
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1985 53–13 80.3% #3 2,210 3 22
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,233 3 22
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,136 4 25
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,031 4 25
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,941 4 25
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1990 8–9 47.1% #31 1,809 4 25
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —