H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Jamea Jackson H2H: 0-1

Jamea Jackson holds a 1–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jamea Jackson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jamea Jackson won the 2005 Memphis round of 32 7-6(4) 0-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jamea Jackson
USA Age 40 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jamea Jackson #149 7-6(4) 0-6 6-3 Amy Frazier #23 Match data Feb 17, 2005* R32 Memphis Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Jamea Jackson #382 #43 479 1,662 33 50 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Jamea Jackson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #444 1,491 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2 2004 2–5 28.6% #156 1,482 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2 2005 10–14 41.7% #80 1,520 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 2006 19–19 50.0% #45 1,608 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 2007 0–6 0.0% #588 1,539 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 2008 2–5 28.6% #273 1,529 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 — — — — — — —
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Jamea Jackson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2005 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2006 11 13 24 45.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2008 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% — 20 37 57 35.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Jamea Jackson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 2003 1492 100.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13
17 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37 2004 1483 106.1 -0.74 -0.28 0.892 47.5% -1 — — 46.7% -0.07 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.03
18 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08 2005 1521 117.6 -0.08 -0.13 1.020 50.4% -39 — +118 43.6% -0.38 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.8 -0.78
19 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 2006 1609 128.7 -0.56 +0.41 1.005 50.0% -63 -80 +192 53.5% +0.27 6–8 (43%) 3–8 (27%) 98.3 +0.35
20 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 2007 1540 95.2 -4.69 -3.50 0.583 38.5% -33 — — 7.7% -3.54 0–1 — — -0.44
21 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 2008 1530 101.3 -3.99 -0.29 0.755 43.5% -25 — — 28.6% -2.21 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
22 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 — 1662 120.0 -1.40 -0.31 0.907 47.8% -44 -80 +164 44.3% -0.45 9–18 (33%) 8–12 (40%) 96.4 -1.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.