H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Janet Lee H2H: 3-0

Amy Frazier holds a 3–0 lead over Janet Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2001 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Janet Lee
TPE Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 29, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Amy Frazier #22 6-4 6-2 Janet Lee #100 Match data
Aug 6, 1998* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #58 7-6 6-2 Janet Lee #88 Match data
Jul 30, 1998* Stanford WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #60 3-6 6-2 6-3 Janet Lee #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Janet Lee #863 #79 390 1,560 31 67 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Janet Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1993 0–1 0.0% #547 1,491 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1994 1–2 33.3% #270 1,508 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1995 4–7 36.4% #169 1,519 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1996 0–2 0.0% #175 1,514 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1997 3–4 42.9% #114 1,526 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1998 4–14 22.2% #86 1,499 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1999 5–10 33.3% #95 1,488 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 2000 5–8 38.5% #117 1,513 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 2001 7–9 43.8% #111 1,544 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2002 1–6 14.3% #217 1,515 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2003 1–3 25.0% #162 1,504 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2005 0–1 0.0% #694 1,488 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —