H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 3-2

Amy Frazier holds a 3–2 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 2000 Japan Open final 5-7 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 55 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 15, 2000* Japan Open WTA 500 F Hard Julie Halard-Decugis #18 5-7 7-5 6-4 Amy Frazier #20 Match data
Aug 13, 1999* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Julie Halard-Decugis #16 7-6 7-5 Amy Frazier #24 Match data
Aug 19, 1998* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R64 Hard Amy Frazier #77 6-0 5-7 7-6 Julie Halard-Decugis #33 Match data
Jun 20, 1990* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Amy Frazier #20 2-6 6-2 6-4 Julie Halard-Decugis #34 Match data
Jan 11, 1989* Sydney WTA 500 R64 Hard Amy Frazier #58 7-6 6-4 Julie Halard-Decugis #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,003 337 219 60.6% 0 0 0 3 9 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,613 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,625 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,708 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,821 0 1
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1992 22–13 62.9% #27 1,837 0 2
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,821 0 2
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,890 0 3
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,917 0 8
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,920 0 10
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2000 29–23 55.8% #15 1,829 0 12
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —