H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 1-1

Amy Frazier and Maria Elena Camerin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on clay, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2004 Roland Garros round of 128 6-3 6-2.

USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Elena Camerin #74 6-3 6-2 Amy Frazier #35 Match data May 26, 2004* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Amy Frazier #68 7-6(2) 6-4 Maria Elena Camerin #97 Match data Jan 17, 2004* QF Hobart International Tier V modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Maria Elena Camerin #817 #41 774 1,667 98 148 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Maria Elena Camerin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 2001 6–5 54.5% #112 1,546 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 2002 5–8 38.5% #123 1,524 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 2003 3–8 27.3% #100 1,494 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 2004 22–20 52.4% #43 1,663 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 2005 11–22 33.3% #99 1,564 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 2006 22–23 48.9% #50 1,610 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2007 9–18 33.3% #100 1,546 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 2008 5–11 31.2% #104 1,512 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 2009 5–14 26.3% #114 1,475 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 2010 6–11 35.3% #111 1,495 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2011 1–4 20.0% #177 1,491 0 0
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 2012 1–2 33.3% #168 1,499 0 0
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 2013 2–2 50.0% #192 1,519 0 0
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Maria Elena Camerin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2004 16 11 27 59.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2005 9 13 22 40.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2006 16 13 29 55.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2009 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2010 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
Career 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% 62 71 133 46.6% 32 56 88 36.4% 4 19 23 17.4% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 34/138 of Amy Frazier's and 104/222 of Maria Elena Camerin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amy Frazier Maria Elena Camerin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 —/— 2003 3/11 1.0 3.3 66.3% 64.6% 48.8% 70.5% 43.5% 59.2% 39.8%
22 —/— 2004 6/42 1.0 2.7 64.3% 55.2% 46.8% 52.7% 53.4% 51.8% 45.0%
23 —/— 2005 3/33 0.3 2.3 66.0% 47.5% 32.0% 53.9% 44.4% 42.5% 38.4%
24 —/— 2006 19/45 0.8 3.7 62.8% 58.0% 45.5% 50.8% 51.1% 53.2% 44.0%
25 —/— 2007 19/27 0.7 5.8 60.3% 56.8% 40.9% 46.5% 50.0% 50.8% 44.1%
26 —/— 2008 13/16 0.5 4.5 63.7% 54.4% 41.2% 36.3% 47.4% 49.5% 38.7%
27 —/— 2009 17/19 0.7 4.3 61.7% 54.9% 39.8% 40.4% 51.9% 49.0% 45.3%
28 —/— 2010 14/17 1.0 5.9 63.1% 54.9% 38.3% 36.0% 51.1% 48.7% 40.7%
29 —/— 2011 5/5 0.6 7.4 57.0% 54.3% 32.2% 39.3% 42.9% 44.3% 43.1%
30 2003 4/27 1.0 7.0 57.0% 59.8% 36.6% 49.3% 62.5% 49.5% 44.1% 2012 3/3 1.3 4.3 57.7% 58.0% 43.3% 62.4% 58.3% 51.6% 45.0%
31 2004 9/52 1.4 8.3 61.0% 61.2% 46.0% 41.9% 48.0% 55.3% 48.1% 2013 2/4 1.0 5.0 63.2% 53.6% 39.6% 56.1% 46.5% 48.6% 47.0%
32 2005 6/34 0.8 7.2 60.1% 58.3% 35.6% 43.8% 42.1% 49.2% 47.8% —/—
33 2006 15/25 1.3 6.9 55.9% 60.7% 44.1% 51.4% 50.8% 53.1% 41.9% —/—
Career 34/723 1.2 7.3 58.1% 60.3% 42.2% 47.3% 49.9% 52.6% 44.8% 104/246 0.8 4.7 62.2% 55.9% 41.2% 45.2% 50.0% 50.2% 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Maria Elena Camerin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 +47 40.0% -0.80 1–0 +0.61
15 1988 1637 125.6 +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) +0.73
16 1989 1717 128.7 +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67
17 1990 1892 153.8 +24 -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37
18 1991 1813 142.7 +14 -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08
19 1992 1844 151.1 +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 2001 1546 108.1 +58 56.0% +0.12 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) +0.85
20 1993 1845 143.2 +1 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 2002 1525 104.8 +9 +20 35.7% -0.68 2–2 (50%) +0.88
21 1994 1904 156.1 +63 -246 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 2003 1495 108.8 +1.20 -0.47 0.973 50.2% +30 -5 38.5% -0.62 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.3 +0.46
22 1995 1877 148.4 +50 -219 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 2004 1663 123.4 -1.01 -0.43 0.934 48.6% +23 -138 -150 49.0% -0.09 9–3 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 107.2 -0.10
23 1996 1836 148.1 +37 -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 2005 1564 109.3 -3.27 -1.94 0.669 41.3% +36 -101 -92 36.8% -0.65 4–6 (40%) 1–6 (14%) 94.3 +1.00
24 1997 1819 152.4 +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 2006 1611 121.4 -1.81 -0.26 0.940 49.0% +12 -112 -120 49.5% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.09
25 1998 1766 134.9 +18 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 2007 1547 119.6 -2.46 -0.09 0.897 47.4% +36 -41 39.1% -0.94 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 97.9 -0.88
26 1999 1877 154.2 +23 -198 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 2008 1513 107.2 -3.15 -3.06 0.768 44.3% +74 -63 39.5% -0.95 1–5 (17%) 2–0 -0.17
27 2000 1854 148.5 +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 2009 1476 106.2 -4.26 +0.53 0.887 47.3% +48 -10 -46 33.3% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) -0.07
28 2001 1696 121.2 +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 2010 1496 96.3 -4.40 -1.63 0.794 44.8% +59 -78 34.1% -1.44 5–2 (71%) +0.60
29 2002 1758 137.9 -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 2011 1492 104.5 -2.78 -0.88 0.774 43.8% -65 27.3% -2.27 0–1 -0.65
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 2012 1500 108.0 -0.75 +0.30 0.931 48.5% 33.3% -0.83 0–1 -0.27
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 2013 1520 103.4 -0.44 -2.36 0.915 47.9% -33 50.0% -0.30 1–1 1–1 -0.06
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09
Career 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 1668 116.9 -2.74 -0.75 0.863 46.8% +31 -52 -105 41.9% -0.58 33–44 (43%) 18–20 (47%) 98.0 +0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.