H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Pam Shriver H2H: 4-1

Amy Frazier holds a 4–1 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1994 Wimbledon first round 6-7 6-2 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Pam Shriver #53 6-7 6-2 8-6 Amy Frazier #23 Match data
Sep 1, 1993* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Amy Frazier #81 3-6 6-3 7-5 Pam Shriver #32 Match data
Mar 16, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #23 6-2 6-0 Pam Shriver #34 Match data
Feb 28, 1992* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #24 6-2 6-3 Pam Shriver #35 Match data
Aug 11, 1988* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #119 6-4 3-6 7-5 Pam Shriver #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24