H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Shinobu Asagoe H2H: 1-1

Amy Frazier and Shinobu Asagoe are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shinobu Asagoe won the 2005 ASB Classic semifinal 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Shinobu Asagoe
JPN Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shinobu Asagoe #37 7-6(4) 6-4 Amy Frazier #26 Match data Jan 8, 2005* SF ASB Classic Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amy Frazier #68 6-3 6-3 Shinobu Asagoe #49 Match data Jan 18, 2004* F Hobart International Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Shinobu Asagoe #215 #21 1,254 1,761 95 121 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Shinobu Asagoe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1997 1–1 50.0% #158 1,526 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 1998 0–3 0.0% #157 1,486 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 1999 3–3 50.0% #122 1,507 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 2000 9–9 50.0% #72 1,580 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2001 10–20 33.3% #108 1,536 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 2002 5–9 35.7% #96 1,521 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 2003 19–15 55.9% #45 1,665 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 2004 19–22 46.3% #37 1,633 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2005 25–25 50.0% #38 1,629 0 0
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 2006 4–14 22.2% #215 1,529 0 0
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Shinobu Asagoe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1998 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2000 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 5 13 18 27.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2003 8 11 19 42.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2004 13 15 28 46.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 15 16 31 48.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% — 57 80 137 41.6% 14 20 34 41.2% 16 14 30 53.3% 8 7 15 53.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 34/138 of Amy Frazier's and 39/143 of Shinobu Asagoe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amy Frazier Shinobu Asagoe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 8/34 0.8 2.0 71.8% 61.9% 43.1% 49.0% 39.1% 56.6% 41.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 10/41 1.2 2.2 70.5% 55.1% 48.0% 45.9% 52.2% 53.2% 42.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 8/50 1.1 2.1 69.5% 62.7% 45.8% 46.7% 49.0% 57.9% 44.9%
30 2003 4/27 1.0 7.0 57.0% 59.8% 36.6% 49.3% 62.5% 49.5% 44.1% 2006 13/18 0.9 4.2 61.9% 57.1% 37.4% 48.7% 55.5% 49.9% 42.1%
31 2004 9/52 1.4 8.3 61.0% 61.2% 46.0% 41.9% 48.0% 55.3% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 6/34 0.8 7.2 60.1% 58.3% 35.6% 43.8% 42.1% 49.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 15/25 1.3 6.9 55.9% 60.7% 44.1% 51.4% 50.8% 53.1% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34/723 1.2 7.3 58.1% 60.3% 42.2% 47.3% 49.9% 52.6% 44.8% — 39/216 1.0 2.8 67.7% 58.7% 43.0% 47.6% 50.0% 53.8% 42.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Shinobu Asagoe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 1997 1526 110.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.75 — — — -0.11
22 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 1998 1486 97.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — +0.03
23 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 1999 1508 112.7 — — — — +48 — — 53.8% +0.38 0–1 — — +0.71
24 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 2000 1581 117.7 — — — — +9 — +37 47.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) — — +1.09
25 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 2001 1536 116.8 — — — — +31 -47 — 37.0% -1.04 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 97.8 -0.76
26 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 2002 1521 114.2 — — — — +9 — — 41.2% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 94.9 +0.18
27 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 2003 1666 120.4 +0.37 -0.93 0.956 48.9% -107 -121 +142 51.9% -0.18 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 109.8 +0.32
28 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 2004 1634 121.9 -0.67 -0.92 0.898 47.5% -54 -33 +147 45.2% -0.45 7–6 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 100.7 +0.66
29 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 2005 1630 136.0 +0.96 +0.30 1.068 51.2% +17 -25 +68 48.1% +0.09 4–6 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 93.3 +1.21
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 2006 1530 106.1 -3.53 -1.20 0.839 46.4% +60 -24 — 26.8% -1.73 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.4 -0.69
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 — 1761 126.0 -1.08 -0.77 0.919 48.2% -7 -44 +107 43.9% -0.46 35–37 (49%) 20–28 (42%) 95.6 +1.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.