H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ana Ivanovic vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 2-1
Ana Ivanovic holds a 2–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Ana Ivanovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2011 Tournament of Champions final 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2011* | Tournament of Champions | WTA Finals | F | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-3 6-0 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
| Jun 4, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Ana Ivanovic | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2004* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Anabel Medina Garrigues | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,852 | 310 | 275 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Ivanovic | Anabel Medina Garrigues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 | 2004 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 | 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 | 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 | 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 | 2008 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 | 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 | 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,565 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 | 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,553 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,501 | 0 | 11 |