H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ana Ivanovic vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-0
Ana Ivanovic holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ana Ivanovic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2007 Luxembourg fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2007* | Luxembourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 7-5 6-4 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2004* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-3 6-1 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 147 | 182 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Ivanovic | Anne Kremer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |