H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Ana Ivanovic vs Elena Baltacha H2H: 1-0
Ana Ivanovic holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Baltacha in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Ivanovic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2012 London Olympics third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2012* | London Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Grass | Ana Ivanovic | 6-4 7-6(5) | Elena Baltacha | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,118 | 421 | 215 | 66.2% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Elena Baltacha | #225 | #49 | 1,179 | 1,669 | 48 | 75 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Ivanovic | Elena Baltacha | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,894 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,037 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,986 | 1 | 8 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,827 | 1 | 8 | 2005 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,939 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,871 | 1 | 11 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 1,874 | 1 | 11 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,856 | 1 | 11 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,024 | 1 | 15 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,850 | 1 | 15 | 2011 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #51 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,687 | 1 | 15 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #174 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |