H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ana Ivanovic vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 5-0
Ana Ivanovic holds a 5–0 lead over Flavia Pennetta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ana Ivanovic leads 5–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2014 Miami third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2014* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-4 6-3 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2013* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 7-6(9) 6-1 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2013 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-4 6-4 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2009* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2008* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-4 6-4 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Ivanovic | Flavia Pennetta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 |