H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ana Ivanovic vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 1-0
Ana Ivanovic holds a 1–0 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Ivanovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2015 Brisbane fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2015* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-4 6-1 | Jarmila Wolfe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Ivanovic | Jarmila Wolfe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 | 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 | 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 | 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 | 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 | 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |