H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Ana Ivanovic vs Kimiko Date H2H: 4-0

Ana Ivanovic holds a 4–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ana Ivanovic leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2011 Beijing round of 64 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ana Ivanovic
SRB Age 38 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ana Ivanovic #18 6-1 6-1 Kimiko Date #81 Match data Oct 5, 2011* R64 Beijing WTA 1000 Hard
Ana Ivanovic #19 6-2 6-0 Kimiko Date #54 Match data Mar 23, 2011* R64 Miami WTA 1000 Hard
Ana Ivanovic #21 6-4 6-2 Kimiko Date #56 Match data Mar 9, 2011* R64 Indian Wells WTA 1000 Hard
Ana Ivanovic #17 7-5 6-7(5) 6-2 Kimiko Date #46 Match data Nov 8, 2010* SF Tournament of Champions WTA Finals Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ana Ivanovic #63 #1 6,912 2,118 421 215 66.2% 1 3 2 7 2 15
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ana Ivanovic Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2004 3–4 42.9% #101 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2005 32–14 69.6% #16 1,850 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2006 36–18 66.7% #14 1,894 0 2 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 2007 49–17 74.2% #4 2,038 0 5 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 2008 38–16 70.4% #5 1,986 1 8 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0
21 2009 22–14 61.1% #21 1,827 1 8 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2010 33–18 64.7% #17 1,939 1 10 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2
23 2011 32–20 61.5% #22 1,871 1 11 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2012 35–19 64.8% #13 1,874 1 11 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5
25 2013 38–23 62.3% #16 1,856 1 11 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7
26 2014 59–18 76.6% #5 2,024 1 15 — — — — — — —
27 2015 29–19 60.4% #16 1,850 1 15 — — — — — — —
28 2016 15–15 50.0% #63 1,687 1 15 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ana Ivanovic Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2004 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2005 21 9 30 70.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 26 12 38 68.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2007 23 11 34 67.6% 16 3 19 84.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2008 26 13 39 66.7% 10 2 12 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2009 15 10 25 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2010 27 12 39 69.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2011 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2012 24 13 37 64.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2013 28 17 45 62.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2014 39 13 52 75.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 21 13 34 61.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286 147 433 66.1% 89 43 132 67.4% 41 23 64 64.1% 5 2 7 71.4% — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ana Ivanovic Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
16 2004 1543 117.5 — — — — +32 — — 41.2% -0.12 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2005 1850 150.3 +3.23 +2.55 1.191 52.9% -43 -122 -247 65.7% +0.96 8–3 (73%) 8–1 (89%) -0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 1895 151.5 +3.56 +2.92 1.182 53.4% -15 -151 -172 64.3% +1.14 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) -1.98 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06
19 2007 2038 159.0 +5.55 +4.04 1.216 54.1% -62 -22 -172 65.5% +1.17 15–3 (83%) 5–2 (71%) -4.71 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20
20 2008 1987 164.1 +5.49 +3.02 1.186 53.6% -11 +74 -137 67.2% +1.20 12–10 (55%) 7–3 (70%) -2.19 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17
21 2009 1828 136.0 +3.01 +1.86 1.108 52.3% -1 +191 +29 60.0% +0.80 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) +1.52 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85
22 2010 1940 156.0 +3.95 +2.72 1.147 52.9% +5 +25 -134 64.2% +1.10 5–4 (56%) 9–5 (64%) -1.74 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50
23 2011 1872 151.9 +4.17 +3.67 1.234 54.3% +36 -19 -25 62.9% +1.43 1–8 (11%) 3–10 (23%) +1.06 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12
24 2012 1875 149.9 +3.85 +3.01 1.152 52.8% +9 +6 +7 63.4% +0.95 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) -0.53 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54
25 2013 1856 156.8 +3.94 +4.03 1.197 54.0% +6 +62 -26 61.7% +1.14 8–13 (38%) 5–8 (38%) +0.08 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14
26 2014 2025 165.5 +4.88 +5.41 1.235 54.6% -23 -26 -102 73.1% +1.51 13–8 (62%) 12–3 (80%) -2.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1850 147.0 +1.43 +3.09 1.121 52.3% +26 +84 0 59.5% +0.82 7–12 (37%) 6–7 (46%) +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1688 126.5 +0.88 +1.41 1.057 51.3% +70 +183 +109 51.5% +0.29 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) +1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16
Career — 2119 159.9 +3.97 +3.42 1.177 53.5% -4 +16 -73 63.8% +1.08 92–82 (53%) 73–62 (54%) -1.58 — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.