H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ana Ivanovic vs Maria Sharapova H2H: 4-10
Maria Sharapova holds a 10–4 lead over Ana Ivanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 6–1 on hard courts and 4–2 on clay. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2015 Brisbane final 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
10
14 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2015* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2014* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-0 6-4 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2014* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-2 5-7 7-5 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| May 16, 2014* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Ana Ivanovic | 6-1 6-4 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2014* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| May 11, 2013* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 6-4 6-3 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2013* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| May 18, 2012* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2012* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-4 0-1 (ret.) | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Jan 27, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | F | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 7-5 6-3 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Nov 5, 2007 | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-1 6-2 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Jun 8, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Ana Ivanovic | 6-2 6-1 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2007* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | SF | Carpet | Ana Ivanovic | 6-1 0-1 (ret.) | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2006* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Ivanovic | Maria Sharapova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 |
| 18 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 |
| 19 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 |
| 20 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 |
| 21 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 |
| 26 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 |
| 28 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 |