H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ana Ivanovic vs Martina Hingis H2H: 1-1
Ana Ivanovic and Martina Hingis are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on carpet, while Ana Ivanovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2007 Tokyo final 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2007* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | F | Carpet | Martina Hingis | 6-4 6-2 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Aug 20, 2006* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-2 6-3 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Ivanovic | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |