H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ana Ivanovic vs Petra Cetkovska H2H: 2-2
Ana Ivanovic and Petra Cetkovska are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Ana Ivanovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2012 Doha third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2012* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Petra Cetkovska | 6-4 6-4 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | (w/o) | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Petra Cetkovska | 6-2 7-6(0) | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Ana Ivanovic | 6-0 6-0 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Ivanovic | Petra Cetkovska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |