H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ana Ivanovic vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 3-1
Ana Ivanovic holds a 3–1 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ana Ivanovic leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2009 Indian Wells quarterfinal W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2009* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | (w/o) | Sybille Bammer | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2008* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-4 6-2 | Sybille Bammer | Match data |
| May 9, 2008* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Ana Ivanovic | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Sybille Bammer | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2007* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Sybille Bammer | 6-7(6) 6-0 6-3 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Ivanovic | Sybille Bammer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |