H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ana Ivanovic vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 3-0
Ana Ivanovic holds a 3–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ana Ivanovic leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2008 Indian Wells third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2008* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-3 6-0 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-0 6-3 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2005 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-2 7-6(3) | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Ivanovic | Tathiana Garbin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |