H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Ana Konjuh vs Klara Koukalova H2H: 0-1
Klara Koukalova holds a 1–0 lead over Ana Konjuh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Klara Koukalova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Klara Koukalova won the 2015 Prague fourth round 6-4 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 28
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 44
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Klara Koukalova | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Ana Konjuh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 80 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Klara Koukalova | #566 | #20 | 1,860 | 1,807 | 275 | 285 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Konjuh | Klara Koukalova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #47 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #63 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #46 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #35 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #117 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,579 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #90 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #40 | 1,611 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,572 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,499 | 0 | 3 |