H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-4

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 4–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2008 Dubai Tennis Championships round of 32 7-6(7) 6-2.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #29 7-6(7) 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 Match data Feb 28, 2008* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anabel Medina Garrigues #27 6-4 4-6 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #5 Match data May 27, 2007* F Strasbourg Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #3 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #33 Match data Aug 27, 2005* SF New Haven Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-0 4-6 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #67 Match data May 27, 2004* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-1 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #70 Match data Jan 25, 2004* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,834 310 278 52.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,495 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,562 0 1 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2004 25–23 52.1% #39 1,708 0 2 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,744 0 4 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,689 0 6 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,682 0 7 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2008 41–25 62.1% #22 1,819 0 8 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,567 0 9 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,783 0 11 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 2012 23–26 46.9% #50 1,618 0 11 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,541 0 11
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,491 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2002 9 3 12 75.0% 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8%
25 2008 21 15 36 58.3% 18 7 25 72.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2009 19 18 37 51.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2010 4 13 17 23.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2012 8 13 21 38.1% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
30 2013 2 8 10 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 125 149 274 45.6% 168 99 267 62.9% 15 21 36 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2% 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 326/508 of Anabel Medina Garrigues's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2004 6/48 1.8 0.7 78.0% 58.3% 59.5% 62.0% 59.9% 58.6% 46.3% —/—
22 2005 5/51 2.2 1.8 64.4% 56.8% 36.3% 52.9% 45.1% 49.6% 48.6% —/—
23 2006 24/58 0.8 1.8 61.8% 56.1% 49.6% 49.2% 58.3% 53.5% 44.6% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2007 42/47 1.2 1.7 62.3% 63.3% 47.4% 49.5% 51.9% 57.3% 44.3% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2008 51/66 1.1 1.0 67.2% 61.0% 52.7% 53.2% 53.7% 58.3% 47.3% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2009 47/59 1.1 1.7 65.4% 63.4% 45.4% 46.8% 51.9% 56.9% 46.0% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2010 40/43 1.1 1.8 63.9% 59.5% 46.7% 50.2% 45.9% 54.8% 46.0% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2011 44/56 0.7 1.0 66.7% 62.3% 49.9% 48.2% 55.5% 58.3% 49.6% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 2012 46/49 1.5 1.3 64.2% 60.7% 46.8% 54.9% 42.5% 55.9% 42.8% 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
30 2013 19/27 1.9 2.3 63.2% 61.4% 43.9% 45.3% 45.3% 55.3% 44.7% —/—
31 2014 2/4 0.5 2.0 65.9% 56.8% 23.0% 63.9% 25.0% 45.3% 36.3% —/—

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1488 98.9 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.12
16 1996 1523 102.5 50.0% -0.20 1–1 +0.03
17 2000 1495 109.4 +46 37.5% -0.88 0–2 0–1 -0.45 1997 1556 126.4 -24 +36 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) -0.06
18 2001 1563 117.3 -85 +93 48.8% +0.08 4–10 (29%) 2–5 (29%) +0.66 1998 1729 146.0 -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) -0.59
19 2002 1688 129.0 -48 75.0% +1.87 2–0 0–1 +0.26 1999 1912 159.1 -27 -138 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) +1.67
20 2003 1613 108.3 0 +20 49.2% +0.02 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) +1.71 2000 1907 163.5 -30 +17 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) -1.71
21 2004 1708 129.8 +1.41 +0.60 1.118 51.8% -57 +9 -121 53.7% +0.07 6–8 (43%) 2–3 (40%) -1.46 2001 2023 167.1 -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) -2.74
22 2005 1745 135.2 -1.51 +1.69 0.965 49.2% -99 +158 -209 53.6% +0.26 6–6 (50%) 5–9 (36%) -2.02 2002 2062 162.6 +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) -0.13
23 2006 1689 128.8 -1.72 -0.23 0.958 49.1% -75 +209 -104 55.6% +0.38 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) +2.64 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) -2.28
24 2007 1682 135.1 +0.95 +0.79 1.039 50.5% -106 +315 53.6% +0.32 7–11 (39%) 8–3 (73%) +0.01 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) -0.48
25 2008 1820 137.4 +2.98 +3.19 1.133 52.6% -59 +96 -278 58.5% +0.61 11–11 (50%) 8–9 (47%) -0.46 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) -0.83
26 2009 1684 126.3 +0.93 +1.02 1.069 51.3% -23 +170 -48 52.7% +0.20 11–6 (65%) 5–2 (71%) +2.67 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) -3.85
27 2010 1568 122.5 -1.00 +1.31 1.018 50.4% -21 +188 44.7% -0.10 4–8 (33%) 0–4 (0%) +0.63 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) -1.04
28 2011 1783 138.0 +2.59 +4.74 1.189 53.8% -112 +101 61.8% +0.86 2–8 (20%) 6–7 (46%) -1.92 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) +0.52
29 2012 1619 120.1 +0.13 -0.99 0.970 49.5% -31 +157 -55 49.1% +0.03 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) +1.56 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) -1.60
30 2013 1542 118.6 -0.14 +0.99 1.001 49.5% -27 +153 -29 38.7% -0.87 2–10 (17%) 2–2 (50%) -1.16
31 2014 1491 90.1 -2.24 -1.41 0.663 41.1% 11.1% -3.22 0–1 +0.24
Career 1834 132.6 +0.82 +1.48 1.053 51.0% -62 +135 -114 52.6% +0.21 79–99 (44%) 54–55 (50%) 94.1 +0.50 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.