H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-4

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 4–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2008 Dubai third round 7-6(7) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 28, 2008* Dubai WTA 500 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #29 7-6(7) 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 Match data
May 27, 2007* Strasbourg WTA 500 F Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #27 6-4 4-6 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #5 Match data
Aug 27, 2005* New Haven WTA 500 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #33 Match data
May 27, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-0 4-6 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #67 Match data
Jan 25, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-1 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 — — — — — — —