H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 0-5

Anna Chakvetadze holds a 5–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anna Chakvetadze leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2009 Rome second round 6-2 6-3.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 5
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 6, 2009* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anna Chakvetadze #22 6-2 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #16 Match data
Feb 9, 2007* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Anna Chakvetadze #13 4-6 6-4 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #33 Match data
Oct 1, 2006* Guangzhou WTA 500 F Hard Anna Chakvetadze #26 6-1 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 Match data
Aug 9, 2006* Los Angeles WTA 500 R64 Hard Anna Chakvetadze #29 6-4 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #23 Match data
May 11, 2006* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Anna Chakvetadze #27 6-3 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,067 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Anna Chakvetadze
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,526 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,716 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,936 0 2
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,984 0 6
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,721 0 7
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,711 0 7
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,715 0 8
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,641 0 8
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,557 0 8
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11