H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 3-2

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 3–2 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Iveta Benesova leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2011 Marbella third round 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Iveta Benesova
CZE Age 43 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 7, 2011* Marbella WTA 250 R32 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #62 6-0 6-2 Iveta Benesova #42 Match data
Jan 19, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Iveta Benesova #60 6-0 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #81 Match data
Jan 14, 2010* Hobart WTA 250 R32 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #26 7-5 6-3 Iveta Benesova #39 Match data
Mar 27, 2009* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Iveta Benesova #31 6-4 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #21 Match data
Jun 13, 2005 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R32 Grass Anabel Medina Garrigues #34 6-4 7-6(5) Iveta Benesova #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Iveta Benesova #671 #25 1,811 1,760 177 221 44.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Iveta Benesova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 2002 6–9 40.0% #82 1,565 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2003 9–19 32.1% #132 1,478 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2004 25–19 56.8% #36 1,657 0 1
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2005 21–27 43.8% #55 1,613 0 1
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2006 17–21 44.7% #58 1,594 0 1
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2007 6–14 30.0% #116 1,522 0 1
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2008 20–17 54.1% #43 1,641 0 1
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2009 29–25 53.7% #38 1,646 0 1
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2010 18–24 42.9% #59 1,636 0 2
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2011 16–24 40.0% #54 1,650 0 2
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2012 10–17 37.0% #81 1,587 0 2
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2014 0–5 0.0% #671 1,526 0 2