H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anastasia Myskina vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 2-2
Anastasia Myskina and Amanda Coetzer are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Myskina leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2004 Sydney fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2004* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 6-3 6-0 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Jun 19, 2003* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Amanda Coetzer | 6-2 6-4 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2001* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 6-3 7-5 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2000* | Oklahoma | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Amanda Coetzer | 7-5 6-2 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Myskina | Amanda Coetzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 |