H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anastasia Myskina vs Amy Frazier H2H: 2-1

Anastasia Myskina holds a 2–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Anastasia Myskina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2005 US Open second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Myskina
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Anastasia Myskina #13 6-3 6-2 Amy Frazier #73 Match data
Jun 27, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Amy Frazier #36 4-6 6-4 6-4 Anastasia Myskina #3 Match data
Jun 22, 2000* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Anastasia Myskina #50 6-4 7-6(3) Amy Frazier #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Myskina #1,101 #2 4,247 2,084 235 138 63.0% 1 3 0 4 2 10
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Myskina Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 1999 10–6 62.5% #65 1,620 0 1 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 2000 15–17 46.9% #58 1,657 0 1 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 2001 11–13 45.8% #59 1,707 0 1 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 2002 46–27 63.0% #11 1,882 0 2 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 2003 42–21 66.7% #7 1,958 0 6 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 2004 45–16 73.8% #3 2,040 1 9 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 2005 35–18 66.0% #14 1,934 1 10 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 2006 31–18 63.3% #16 1,818 1 10 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2007 0–2 0.0% #1043 1,769 1 10 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 — — — — — — — 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 — — — — — — — 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8