H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anastasia Myskina vs Barbara Schett H2H: 3-1
Anastasia Myskina holds a 3–1 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Anastasia Myskina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2004 San Diego third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2004* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 6-3 6-4 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2001* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | QF | Carpet | Anastasia Myskina | 6-4 6-2 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2000* | Sopot | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Anastasia Myskina | 5-7 6-1 6-1 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1999* | Kremlin Cup | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Barbara Schett | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Myskina | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |