H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Myskina vs Bianka Lamade H2H: 0-1

Bianka Lamade holds a 1–0 lead over Anastasia Myskina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bianka Lamade leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bianka Lamade won the 2001 Charleston Open round of 64 6-3 5-3 RET.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
GER Age 44 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bianka Lamade #117 6-3 5-3 (ret.) Anastasia Myskina #69 Match data Apr 18, 2001* R64 Charleston Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Myskina #1,101 #2 4,247 2,078 240 141 63.0% 1 2 0 3 4 10
Bianka Lamade #1,261 #59 538 1,668 21 28 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Myskina Bianka Lamade
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 10–6 62.5% #65 1,620 0 1 2000 3–2 60.0% #126 1,542 0 0
18 2000 16–18 47.1% #58 1,659 0 1 2001 14–12 53.8% #67 1,627 0 1
19 2001 11–13 45.8% #59 1,716 0 1 2002 4–13 23.5% #223 1,537 0 1
20 2002 46–27 63.0% #11 1,883 0 2 2003 0–1 0.0% #178 1,527 0 1
21 2003 42–21 66.7% #7 1,957 0 6
22 2004 49–18 73.1% #3 2,043 1 9
23 2005 35–18 66.0% #14 1,935 1 10
24 2006 31–18 63.3% #16 1,821 1 10
25 2007 0–2 0.0% #1043 1,772 1 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Myskina Bianka Lamade
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 3 2 5 60.0%
18 2000 5 8 13 38.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 7 3 10 70.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2001 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2002 21 15 36 58.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 2003 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2003 21 13 34 61.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 0 8 100.0%
22 2004 32 14 46 69.6% 11 3 14 78.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
23 2005 27 11 38 71.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2006 13 11 24 54.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 125 82 207 60.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 36 15 51 70.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 10 16 26 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Myskina Bianka Lamade
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1999 1620 127.2 -30 +8 59.0% +0.67 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 104.6 +0.32 2000 1542 112.0 +40 58.3% +0.17 1–1 +0.15
18 2000 1659 127.5 -67 -8 +28 48.8% -0.29 7–9 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 101.4 -0.66 2001 1628 123.2 -38 +12 49.1% -0.16 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 +0.29
19 2001 1716 138.4 -38 -105 +14 51.9% +0.04 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.5 -0.91 2002 1537 104.6 +28 +5 +27 28.2% -1.56 2–3 (40%) 1–1 -0.54
20 2002 1884 149.1 -69 -141 +13 57.4% +0.59 21–9 (70%) 10–9 (53%) 109.4 -2.10 2003 1527 98.8 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.14
21 2003 1958 153.9 +0.52 +3.26 1.066 52.0% -6 -162 -52 61.5% +0.76 12–7 (63%) 6–1 (86%) 107.0 -0.46
22 2004 2044 167.4 +2.89 +5.17 1.223 54.7% -6 -77 -143 67.7% +1.35 16–9 (64%) 6–6 (50%) 100.6 -2.19
23 2005 1935 144.8 +0.74 +3.08 1.103 52.3% +52 -92 -21 58.7% +0.82 14–7 (67%) 6–9 (40%) 98.5 +2.09
24 2006 1821 138.4 -0.60 +2.50 1.023 50.6% -7 +27 +205 62.5% +0.63 6–8 (43%) 10–5 (67%) 96.2 -0.39
25 2007 1772 94.1 -4.25 -1.94 0.614 39.1% 20.0% -3.80 0–1 1–0 +0.01
Career 2078 153.4 +0.42 +3.14 1.067 51.6% -14 -79 +33 59.4% +0.65 84–59 (59%) 49–33 (60%) 108.0 -1.14 1669 116.2 -11 +16 +27 41.8% -0.67 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.9 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.