H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anastasia Myskina vs Cara Black H2H: 1-1
Anastasia Myskina and Cara Black are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cara Black leads 1–0 on clay, while Anastasia Myskina leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2006 Wimbledon first round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anastasia Myskina | 6-0 6-4 | Cara Black | Match data |
| May 31, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Cara Black | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Myskina | Cara Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |