H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anastasia Myskina vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 5-2

Anastasia Myskina holds a 5–2 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Myskina leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2004 Montreal fourth round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Myskina
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 6, 2004* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Anastasia Myskina #4 6-4 6-0 Chanda Rubin #24 Match data
Jul 30, 2004* San Diego WTA 1000 R16 Hard Anastasia Myskina #5 6-1 6-2 Chanda Rubin #23 Match data
Jan 28, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Anastasia Myskina #7 6-7(3) 6-2 6-2 Chanda Rubin #10 Match data
Jan 22, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Anastasia Myskina #12 4-6 6-4 6-1 Chanda Rubin #13 Match data
Jun 23, 2002* Eastbourne WTA 500 F Grass Chanda Rubin #37 6-1 6-3 Anastasia Myskina #19 Match data
Apr 13, 2000* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Chanda Rubin #25 6-1 3-6 6-4 Anastasia Myskina #55 Match data
Oct 21, 1999* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Anastasia Myskina #92 6-4 6-3 Chanda Rubin #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Myskina #1,101 #2 4,247 2,084 235 138 63.0% 1 3 0 4 2 10
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Myskina Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1999 10–6 62.5% #65 1,620 0 1 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 2000 15–17 46.9% #58 1,657 0 1 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 2001 11–13 45.8% #59 1,707 0 1 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 2002 46–27 63.0% #11 1,882 0 2 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 2003 42–21 66.7% #7 1,958 0 6 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 2004 45–16 73.8% #3 2,040 1 9 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 2005 35–18 66.0% #14 1,934 1 10 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 2006 31–18 63.3% #16 1,818 1 10 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 2007 0–2 0.0% #1043 1,769 1 10 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7