H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anastasia Myskina vs Denisa Chladkova H2H: 3-0
Anastasia Myskina holds a 3–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Myskina leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2004 Roland Garros third round 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Anastasia Myskina | 6-3 7-6(3) | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2002* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Myskina | Denisa Chladkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |