H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anastasia Myskina vs Iva Majoli H2H: 2-0
Anastasia Myskina holds a 2–0 lead over Iva Majoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Myskina leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2001 Leipzig third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2001* | Leipzig | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Anastasia Myskina | 6-3 6-2 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2001* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Anastasia Myskina | 6-3 6-1 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Myskina | Iva Majoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 |
| 20 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 |
| 23 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 |