H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anastasia Myskina vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 3-1
Anastasia Myskina holds a 3–1 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Myskina leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2005 Australian Open third round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | (w/o) | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2004* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2002* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2001* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Lisa Raymond | 1-6 6-2 7-6(5) | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Myskina | Lisa Raymond | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |