H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anastasia Myskina vs Magui Serna H2H: 4-0
Anastasia Myskina holds a 4–0 lead over Magui Serna in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Myskina leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2004 Dubai fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2004* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 6-1 6-4 | Magui Serna | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2003* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Anastasia Myskina | 6-3 6-1 | Magui Serna | Match data |
| May 16, 2002* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Anastasia Myskina | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-2 | Magui Serna | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2001* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Anastasia Myskina | 6-2 6-2 | Magui Serna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| Magui Serna | #1,293 | #19 | 1,330 | 1,848 | 186 | 187 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Myskina | Magui Serna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #41 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #39 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #37 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 | 2001 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 | 2002 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 | 2003 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,746 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #103 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #379 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |