H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anastasia Myskina vs María Sánchez Lorenzo H2H: 1-1
Anastasia Myskina and María Sánchez Lorenzo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 1–0 on clay, while Anastasia Myskina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, María Sánchez Lorenzo won the 2005 Roland Garros first round 6-4 4-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 6-4 4-6 6-0 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | María Sánchez Lorenzo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Myskina | María Sánchez Lorenzo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 | 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 | 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |