H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anastasia Myskina vs Martina Hingis H2H: 1-2
Martina Hingis holds a 2–1 lead over Anastasia Myskina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2006 Dubai fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2006* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-4 6-3 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2002* | New Haven | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 6-7(2) 6-4 6-0 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2000* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-0 6-4 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Myskina | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |