H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anastasia Myskina vs Mary Pierce H2H: 3-1
Anastasia Myskina holds a 3–1 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Anastasia Myskina leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2003 US Open fourth round 7-6(2) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 7-6(2) 6-1 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2003* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Mary Pierce | 6-4 1-6 6-2 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2003* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Anastasia Myskina | 7-5 6-4 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Apr 5, 2002* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anastasia Myskina | 6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | Mary Pierce | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Myskina | Mary Pierce | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 |
| 23 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 |
| 24 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 |