H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anastasia Myskina vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 1-0
Anastasia Myskina holds a 1–0 lead over Michaella Krajicek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Myskina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Myskina won the 2006 Istanbul semifinal 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2006* | Istanbul | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Anastasia Myskina | 6-2 7-6(5) | Michaella Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Myskina | Michaella Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 | 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |