H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anastasia Myskina vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 0-1
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 1–0 lead over Anastasia Myskina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2005 Charleston third round 6-3 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2005* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Anastasia Myskina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Myskina | #1,101 | #2 | 4,247 | 2,084 | 235 | 138 | 63.0% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Myskina | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | 1999 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 18 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #58 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #59 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 2002 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2003 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #7 | 1,958 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2004 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #3 | 2,040 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #14 | 1,934 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #16 | 1,818 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,769 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 |