H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 1-2

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 2–1 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Coco Vandeweghe leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2017 Stanford quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Russia Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Vandeweghe #24 6-2 6-3 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #18 Match data Aug 5, 2017* QF Stanford Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #23 6-3 6-3 Coco Vandeweghe #30 Match data Jul 5, 2016* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Coco Vandeweghe #104 7-6(7) 7-5 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #21 Match data Mar 19, 2014* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #445 #11 3,590 1,944 422 328 56.3% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Coco Vandeweghe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,593 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,702 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,824 0 2 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,813 0 3 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,712 0 3 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,798 0 5 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,764 0 7 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,868 0 8 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1
24 2016 26–25 51.0% #27 1,749 0 8 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2
26 2018 21–21 50.0% #42 1,806 0 12 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,797 0 12 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,802 0 12 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2
29 2021 27–19 58.7% #11 1,835 0 12 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,793 0 12 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,814 0 12 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,846 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,811 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #445 1,727 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Coco Vandeweghe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 17 12 29 58.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 31 14 45 68.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 26 15 41 63.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 2012 11 14 25 44.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2013 26 16 42 61.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2014 16 13 29 55.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
23 2015 29 14 43 67.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
24 2016 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
25 2017 31 17 48 64.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
26 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 2019 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 6 4 10 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 15 14 29 51.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
30 2022 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2023 6 8 14 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 21 13 34 61.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 298 220 518 57.5% 90 74 164 54.9% 27 30 57 47.4% 7 4 11 63.6% — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 675/751 of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova's and 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.9% 63.0% 41.7% 42.9% 50.0% 52.9% 33.3% 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1%
15 2007 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 30.0% 25.0% 25.0% — 27.8% 14.3% 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9%
16 2008 14/18 1.9 3.1 57.9% 64.6% 45.1% 37.4% 48.4% 56.5% 45.9% 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5%
17 2009 43/44 2.0 5.1 58.9% 64.8% 43.9% 52.3% 46.7% 56.0% 44.0% 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4%
18 2010 54/60 2.6 5.3 59.2% 64.8% 45.4% 54.3% 46.6% 56.8% 46.4% 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0%
19 2011 55/58 3.0 6.1 60.1% 67.0% 46.1% 50.9% 53.5% 58.3% 46.3% 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7%
20 2012 40/44 2.4 5.6 59.2% 64.5% 41.9% 50.5% 46.8% 55.0% 42.7% 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2%
21 2013 47/55 2.9 5.4 56.6% 68.7% 46.2% 52.4% 48.3% 59.1% 44.5% 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9%
22 2014 38/46 3.9 7.4 56.4% 69.2% 39.6% 55.3% 52.4% 56.4% 42.7% 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3%
23 2015 38/55 2.3 5.4 65.0% 65.0% 49.8% 53.2% 46.1% 59.4% 40.5% 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0%
24 2016 42/51 2.8 4.0 62.7% 65.6% 43.7% 49.9% 53.7% 57.3% 45.0% 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9%
25 2017 64/64 3.0 4.5 62.3% 65.3% 46.2% 57.3% 45.7% 58.2% 45.1% 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3%
26 2018 40/42 2.6 4.3 65.0% 66.1% 43.9% 53.5% 44.9% 58.5% 42.8% 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2%
27 2019 43/43 2.3 4.7 62.3% 64.5% 43.4% 52.8% 52.7% 56.5% 44.2% 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4%
28 2020 17/17 2.6 4.9 68.4% 63.0% 42.0% 43.8% 46.7% 56.8% 44.8% 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7%
29 2021 40/46 2.5 3.5 67.9% 64.9% 45.5% 51.1% 50.1% 58.6% 44.6% 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4%
30 2022 5/5 1.6 4.0 76.0% 63.4% 43.9% 59.5% 62.2% 57.8% 47.5% 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7%
31 2023 26/26 3.0 4.8 62.0% 65.2% 45.9% 57.5% 47.3% 57.1% 45.2% 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8%
32 2024 44/45 3.3 4.0 61.4% 66.7% 49.9% 53.6% 49.7% 60.5% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 18/24 3.3 4.9 60.8% 65.5% 42.7% 48.1% 49.6% 56.0% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 5/6 2.8 5.0 55.8% 63.4% 35.4% 43.7% 16.8% 51.0% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 675/751 2.7 5.0 61.4% 65.7% 44.9% 52.4% 48.6% 57.5% 44.0% — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1497 106.7 -0.12 +2.94 0.708 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21
15 2007 1495 95.3 -1.54 +1.90 0.198 21.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.22 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09
16 2008 1594 123.9 +0.60 +1.13 1.055 51.1% -34 -21 +41 55.0% +0.70 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.0 -0.10 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14
17 2009 1703 137.4 +0.76 +0.27 1.001 50.1% +30 -139 -61 55.8% +0.34 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 96.6 +1.57 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10
18 2010 1824 147.5 +0.89 +3.14 1.073 51.5% +11 -209 -176 60.6% +0.69 12–5 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 108.5 -0.83 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28
19 2011 1813 146.7 +2.42 +2.57 1.110 52.3% -13 -37 -201 62.8% +0.83 11–14 (44%) 8–7 (53%) 95.3 -0.73 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49
20 2012 1713 124.6 -0.76 -0.32 0.950 49.0% -8 +17 -68 45.2% -0.40 7–4 (64%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +0.72 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31
21 2013 1799 143.5 +3.24 +0.98 1.086 51.6% +2 -43 — 58.4% +0.54 10–9 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 100.1 -0.38 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12
22 2014 1764 137.7 +1.25 -0.29 0.980 49.9% +33 -44 -144 54.8% +0.26 13–7 (65%) 8–5 (62%) 104.1 +0.90 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26
23 2015 1869 139.6 +1.52 -0.40 0.997 49.9% +23 -165 -236 54.6% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–8 (53%) 108.8 -1.25 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43
24 2016 1750 138.9 +1.58 +1.71 1.055 51.0% -10 -52 -71 49.5% +0.19 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 96.0 -0.64 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72
25 2017 1833 151.2 +2.14 +2.10 1.077 51.6% +42 -19 -187 58.9% +0.68 16–9 (64%) 7–10 (41%) 101.9 -0.09 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00
26 2018 1806 145.1 +1.80 +0.68 1.031 50.5% +1 +47 -166 49.5% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 98.9 -1.51 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76
27 2019 1797 148.1 +0.11 +1.68 1.017 50.5% +27 -20 — 51.5% +0.15 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 96.0 -0.49 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01
28 2020 1803 141.4 +0.01 +2.18 1.037 50.4% +63 -58 — 50.0% +0.20 4–2 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 102.3 -0.92 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12
29 2021 1835 148.9 +1.86 +2.03 1.077 51.4% -27 +92 -189 58.1% +0.77 6–7 (46%) 4–9 (31%) 94.1 -0.77 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17
30 2022 1793 111.4 +0.38 +1.45 1.125 52.8% +16 — — 53.8% +0.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.51 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03
31 2023 1815 138.1 +0.92 +1.92 1.054 51.1% -40 +71 — 50.8% +0.34 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 101.6 -0.81 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
32 2024 1846 155.5 +3.69 +0.67 1.095 51.8% +87 -44 -230 56.0% +0.51 6–8 (43%) 7–2 (78%) 100.6 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 1811 137.4 -0.74 -2.12 0.901 47.9% +27 -60 -83 46.3% -0.35 5–3 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 104.0 -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1728 114.6 -1.24 -1.82 0.702 43.0% +26 — — 7.7% -2.46 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1944 149.9 +1.44 +1.21 1.037 50.8% +15 -30 -132 54.5% +0.35 137–115 (54%) 101–91 (53%) 100.2 -0.90 — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.