H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 1-2
Coco Vandeweghe holds a 2–1 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Coco Vandeweghe leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2017 Stanford quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2017* | Stanford | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Coco Vandeweghe | 6-2 6-3 | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6-3 6-3 | Coco Vandeweghe | Match data |
| Mar 19, 2014* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Coco Vandeweghe | 7-6(7) 7-5 | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | #400 | #11 | 3,590 | 1,936 | 415 | 324 | 56.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| Coco Vandeweghe | #815 | #9 | 3,258 | 1,877 | 138 | 151 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Coco Vandeweghe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2008 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #45 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #476 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2009 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #322 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #36 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #113 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #28 | 1,867 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,744 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2017 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,832 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2018 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,805 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #31 | 1,796 | 0 | 12 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #241 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 12 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #11 | 1,826 | 0 | 12 | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #174 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,786 | 0 | 12 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2023 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,533 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2024 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,839 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #47 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,725 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |