H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Karolina Pliskova H2H: 2-4

Karolina Pliskova holds a 4–2 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Karolina Pliskova leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Karolina Pliskova won the 2021 US Open fourth round 7-5 6-4.

RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
CZE Age 34 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 7, 2021* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Karolina Pliskova #4 7-5 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #15 Match data
May 3, 2021* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #41 6-0 7-5 Karolina Pliskova #9 Match data
Jan 26, 2020* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #30 7-6(4) 7-6(3) Karolina Pliskova #2 Match data
Aug 10, 2017* Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Karolina Pliskova #1 6-3 6-3 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #19 Match data
Sep 4, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Karolina Pliskova #11 6-2 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #18 Match data
Feb 18, 2015* Dubai WTA 1000 R64 Hard Karolina Pliskova #18 6-2 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12
Karolina Pliskova #64 #1 6,940 2,041 421 241 63.6% 0 3 0 9 5 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Karolina Pliskova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #736 1,491 0 0
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0 2008 2–1 66.7% #465 1,530 0 0
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #221 1,521 0 0
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2 2010 0–1 0.0% #212 1,504 0 0
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,467 0 0
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3 2012 1–6 14.3% #118 1,444 0 0
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5 2013 11–15 42.3% #71 1,514 0 1
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7 2014 44–24 64.7% #23 1,799 0 3
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8 2015 50–25 66.7% #11 1,813 0 4
24 2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8 2016 38–19 66.7% #6 1,901 0 6
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2017 52–18 74.3% #4 1,930 0 9
26 2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12 2018 46–21 68.7% #8 1,916 0 11
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12 2019 51–16 76.1% #2 1,975 0 15
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12 2020 14–8 63.6% #6 1,914 0 16
29 2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12 2021 35–18 66.0% #4 1,972 0 16
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12 2022 21–19 52.5% #31 1,834 0 16
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12 2023 17–20 45.9% #38 1,759 0 16
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12 2024 20–17 54.1% #41 1,777 0 17
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12 2026 19–8 70.4% #64 1,879 0 17