H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 0-3
Nadia Petrova holds a 3–0 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2012 Charleston fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2012* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Nadia Petrova | 6-1 6-4 | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Nadia Petrova | 6-3 6-3 | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Match data |
| May 13, 2010* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Nadia Petrova | 6-2 7-5 | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | #400 | #11 | 3,590 | 1,936 | 415 | 324 | 56.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,077 | 441 | 276 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Nadia Petrova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2008 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #45 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2009 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #36 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #12 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #28 | 1,867 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,945 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,744 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,990 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2017 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,832 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,931 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2018 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,805 | 0 | 12 | 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #31 | 1,796 | 0 | 12 | 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 12 | 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,828 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #11 | 1,826 | 0 | 12 | 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,781 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,786 | 0 | 12 | 2012 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2023 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,718 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2024 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,839 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2025 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #47 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,725 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |