H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Anastasia Potapova vs Patricia Maria Tig H2H: 1-0
Anastasia Potapova holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Maria Tig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Potapova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Potapova won the 2019 Jurmala quarterfinal 6-4 0-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 25
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 31
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2019* | Jurmala | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Anastasia Potapova | 6-4 0-6 6-4 | Patricia Maria Tig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Potapova | #27 | #21 | 1,865 | 1,965 | 163 | 132 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,739 | 40 | 52 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #93 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #92 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #69 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #27 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #232 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2025 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #50 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #27 | 1,879 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |