Anastasia Potapova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucia Bronzetti | 6 | 0 | 6 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Mirra Andreeva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 11, 2026 | H2H |
| Marta Kostyuk | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 30, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anastasia Potapova vs Patricia Maria Tig H2H: 1-0
Anastasia Potapova holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Maria Tig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Potapova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Potapova won the 2019 Jurmala quarterfinal 6-4 0-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Potapova | 6-4 0-6 6-4 | Patricia Maria Tig | Match data | Jul 27, 2019* | QF | Jurmala | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Potapova | #25 | #21 | 1,865 | 1,965 | 168 | 136 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,743 | 41 | 52 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #93 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #92 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #108 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #27 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #232 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2025 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #50 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #25 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2015 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2016 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2023 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2017 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2024 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2025 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2019 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2020 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 99 | 93 | 192 | 51.6% | 57 | 29 | 86 | 66.3% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | — | 21 | 28 | 49 | 42.9% | 19 | 21 | 40 | 47.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 289/306 of Anastasia Potapova's and 86/90 of Patricia Maria Tig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 45.2% | 47.4% | 39.1% | 37.5% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 51.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 13/13 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 53.4% | 66.4% | 45.1% | 60.2% | 45.2% | 56.5% | 46.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 30/30 | 2.1 | 6.0 | 51.4% | 60.6% | 41.1% | 53.0% | 45.4% | 51.0% | 43.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 10/10 | 3.2 | 4.9 | 52.1% | 64.6% | 47.2% | 46.9% | 48.4% | 55.8% | 46.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 30/31 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 53.9% | 64.6% | 42.0% | 49.2% | 50.1% | 53.8% | 43.8% | 2015 | 7/9 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 66.4% | 60.7% | 49.6% | 63.7% | 63.0% | 57.9% | 44.1% |
| 21 | 2022 | 41/42 | 1.4 | 4.0 | 63.3% | 63.5% | 45.7% | 51.0% | 52.1% | 56.5% | 47.7% | 2016 | 19/19 | 1.9 | 6.6 | 58.4% | 60.6% | 43.5% | 52.1% | 43.8% | 53.4% | 42.6% |
| 22 | 2023 | 47/47 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 57.9% | 63.6% | 44.6% | 55.2% | 45.0% | 55.5% | 45.4% | 2017 | 11/13 | 0.8 | 4.0 | 55.1% | 57.8% | 42.5% | 43.5% | 28.3% | 51.4% | 38.3% |
| 23 | 2024 | 48/48 | 2.3 | 4.8 | 55.5% | 64.4% | 43.4% | 56.9% | 46.7% | 55.1% | 43.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2025 | 26/40 | 2.0 | 4.6 | 52.9% | 62.3% | 46.2% | 46.5% | 46.3% | 54.6% | 41.7% | 2019 | 12/12 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 64.8% | 63.3% | 46.2% | 65.0% | 47.8% | 57.7% | 46.2% |
| 25 | 2026 | 43/44 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 56.4% | 65.0% | 42.0% | 55.9% | 53.8% | 54.7% | 44.7% | 2020 | 16/16 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 61.4% | 64.4% | 43.6% | 54.4% | 59.3% | 56.0% | 49.3% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12/12 | 1.8 | 4.7 | 58.2% | 60.5% | 40.4% | 54.5% | 40.9% | 52.3% | 38.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9/9 | 0.9 | 6.4 | 59.7% | 50.8% | 36.9% | 46.5% | 44.6% | 45.2% | 41.4% |
| Career | — | 289/306 | 2.2 | 4.9 | 56.1% | 63.7% | 43.8% | 53.2% | 48.4% | 54.8% | 44.7% | — | 86/93 | 1.4 | 5.0 | 60.2% | 60.3% | 43.1% | 53.9% | 46.5% | 53.6% | 43.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2017 | 1476 | 93.4 | -2.12 | +2.32 | 0.895 | 47.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 1607 | 121.2 | +0.26 | +1.15 | 1.064 | 51.7% | -33 | +21 | — | 62.1% | +0.55 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +0.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 1596 | 119.2 | -3.93 | +0.45 | 0.889 | 47.4% | -23 | +78 | — | 47.1% | -0.33 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 101.0 | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 1685 | 126.6 | -0.49 | +1.81 | 1.046 | 50.5% | -11 | — | — | 54.2% | +0.17 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–2 (60%) | 104.7 | +0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 1686 | 132.7 | -1.94 | +1.28 | 0.948 | 48.7% | +15 | -64 | -81 | 44.1% | -0.59 | 4–4 (50%) | 6–3 (67%) | 103.7 | -1.41 | 2015 | 1532 | 106.0 | -1.09 | +1.08 | 1.048 | 50.8% | +14 | — | — | 52.9% | -0.29 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.85 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1751 | 139.2 | -0.34 | +3.77 | 1.098 | 52.0% | -56 | +77 | — | 55.8% | +0.50 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.9 | -1.01 | 2016 | 1527 | 104.9 | -1.75 | -1.01 | 0.914 | 48.2% | -21 | +55 | — | 44.7% | -0.62 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.3 | +0.41 |
| 22 | 2023 | 1785 | 143.8 | -0.78 | +2.73 | 1.022 | 50.4% | -38 | +98 | -91 | 56.4% | +0.32 | 17–10 (63%) | 6–7 (46%) | 105.1 | -0.08 | 2017 | 1501 | 110.1 | -3.01 | -2.64 | 0.788 | 44.5% | +29 | +16 | — | 30.4% | -1.48 | 0–1 | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.05 |
| 23 | 2024 | 1800 | 140.8 | -1.22 | +0.81 | 0.965 | 49.4% | +5 | +41 | -88 | 54.7% | +0.18 | 10–6 (63%) | 2–8 (20%) | 99.1 | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2025 | 1840 | 139.6 | -1.70 | -0.49 | 0.920 | 48.4% | -30 | +40 | — | 54.9% | +0.12 | 9–4 (69%) | 5–6 (45%) | 102.3 | -0.67 | 2019 | 1660 | 117.4 | -0.28 | +1.62 | 1.094 | 52.2% | -105 | +70 | — | 64.3% | +0.97 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.92 |
| 25 | 2026 | 1877 | 144.9 | -1.41 | +1.96 | 0.988 | 50.0% | -85 | +155 | -231 | 55.9% | +0.35 | 12–5 (71%) | 5–7 (42%) | 105.9 | +0.55 | 2020 | 1728 | 126.3 | -0.51 | +3.24 | 1.123 | 52.8% | -128 | +65 | — | 65.7% | +1.06 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +1.17 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1626 | 106.9 | -1.94 | -2.64 | 0.797 | 45.6% | -63 | +83 | -83 | 34.6% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.9 | -0.48 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1534 | 106.6 | -5.52 | -1.65 | 0.756 | 43.5% | +4 | — | — | 28.6% | -2.19 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.1 | +0.11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1554 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1469 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +59 | — | 42.9% | -0.28 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.05 |
| Career | — | 1966 | 142.0 | -1.36 | +1.66 | 0.988 | 49.8% | -28 | +77 | -115 | 53.8% | +0.15 | 71–46 (61%) | 36–41 (47%) | 105.9 | -0.38 | — | 1743 | 115.2 | -1.84 | -0.19 | 0.930 | 48.5% | -28 | +59 | -83 | 47.1% | -0.38 | 10–16 (38%) | 13–9 (59%) | 98.4 | +3.20 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Patricia Maria Tig
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 3, 2020 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 30, 2021 | H2H |
| Danka Kovinic | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Anastasija Sevastova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 19, 2019 | H2H |