H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Anastasija Sevastova vs Christina Mchale H2H: 1-2
Christina Mchale holds a 2–1 lead over Anastasija Sevastova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Christina Mchale leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2021 Adelaide fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2021* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-4 6-1 | Christina Mchale | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2019* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2017* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Christina Mchale | 6-0 5-7 7-6(2) | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasija Sevastova | Christina Mchale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |