H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Anastasija Sevastova vs Johanna Larsson H2H: 1-1
Anastasija Sevastova and Johanna Larsson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2016 Istanbul fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2016* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-4 6-3 | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
| May 25, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Johanna Larsson | 6-2 6-2 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Johanna Larsson | #236 | #45 | 1,230 | 1,745 | 153 | 177 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasija Sevastova | Johanna Larsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #70 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #75 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #217 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |