H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasija Sevastova vs Laura Pous-Tio H2H: 2-0

Anastasija Sevastova holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Pous-Tio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2011 Monterrey Open round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasija Sevastova
Latvia Age 36 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Laura Pous-Tio
Spain Age 41 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasija Sevastova #38 6-2 6-4 Laura Pous-Tio #86 Match data Mar 3, 2011* R32 Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Anastasija Sevastova #62 6-2 6-4 Laura Pous-Tio #144 Match data Jul 22, 2010* R32 Bad Gastein International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasija Sevastova #499 #11 3,366 1,956 209 178 54.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Laura Pous-Tio #776 #72 930 1,620 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Laura Pous-Tio
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #261 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 5–9 35.7% #79 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 22–15 59.5% #45 1,699 0 1 2005 7–7 50.0% #90 1,542 0 0
21 2011 12–18 40.0% #98 1,622 0 1 2006 6–14 30.0% #101 1,497 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #184 1,605 0 1 2007 3–6 33.3% #165 1,465 0 0
23 2013 2–2 50.0% #148 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2015 5–3 62.5% #113 1,650 0 1 2010 6–6 50.0% #108 1,529 0 0
26 2016 22–19 53.7% #34 1,713 0 1 2011 13–15 46.4% #75 1,589 0 0
27 2017 37–24 60.7% #16 1,821 0 2 2012 6–9 40.0% #157 1,545 0 0
28 2018 44–22 66.7% #11 1,918 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2019 27–22 55.1% #27 1,759 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2020 1–9 10.0% #54 1,649 0 4 2015 0–1 0.0% #194 1,531 0 0
31 2021 17–18 48.6% #70 1,712 0 4 2016 0–4 0.0% #287 1,427 0 0
32 2022 1–2 33.3% #680 1,699 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2024 4–2 66.7% #481 1,712 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–11 45.0% #188 1,722 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Laura Pous-Tio
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 11 8 19 57.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
23 2013 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2016 10 10 20 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 15 7 22 68.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2018 26 14 40 65.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 10 13 23 43.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 106 219 51.6% 73 51 124 58.9% 23 19 42 54.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — 4 19 23 17.4% 37 40 77 48.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 369/387 of Anastasija Sevastova's and 71/89 of Laura Pous-Tio's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Laura Pous-Tio
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 1.0 2.0 68.6% 61.0% 55.0% 52.2% 50.3% 59.0% 49.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 13/14 1.9 3.8 57.7% 60.9% 42.7% 46.5% 52.6% 53.4% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 34/37 1.9 3.1 59.7% 61.0% 48.4% 50.1% 50.5% 56.0% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 29/30 2.6 3.0 60.2% 61.2% 43.4% 43.8% 50.6% 54.3% 42.8% 2006 12/20 1.1 3.2 65.7% 58.4% 48.6% 56.2% 41.7% 55.0% 43.2%
22 2012 1/1 0.0 0.0 80.0% 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% — 20.0% 28.6% 2007 6/9 1.3 5.2 58.3% 53.0% 43.7% 48.0% 63.9% 49.2% 46.9%
23 2013 4/4 5.3 6.3 52.3% 63.4% 47.3% 53.4% 39.7% 55.6% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 5/8 1.8 2.4 59.9% 62.4% 47.5% 49.0% 51.4% 56.2% 43.7% 2010 7/12 0.6 2.1 71.6% 57.1% 53.3% 52.3% 57.3% 55.3% 46.4%
26 2016 39/41 2.1 2.6 56.4% 64.3% 45.3% 57.0% 48.6% 56.1% 43.1% 2011 27/28 0.7 2.5 67.4% 55.1% 47.8% 54.8% 53.1% 52.8% 46.5%
27 2017 61/61 2.1 2.3 61.2% 63.4% 47.9% 48.5% 54.1% 57.3% 45.3% 2012 14/15 0.6 3.1 59.3% 61.5% 43.4% 55.3% 52.5% 54.0% 47.9%
28 2018 62/66 3.0 2.2 60.8% 66.3% 47.8% 52.6% 50.3% 58.9% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 48/49 2.5 2.0 58.8% 64.8% 50.3% 52.2% 46.3% 58.7% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 10/10 2.4 2.3 60.0% 55.3% 43.1% 43.3% 31.6% 50.7% 37.0% 2015 1/1 0.0 2.0 64.4% 51.1% 61.5% 37.5% 50.0% 54.8% 34.3%
31 2021 33/35 1.9 2.8 59.4% 62.1% 46.7% 54.4% 52.0% 55.9% 44.3% 2016 4/4 0.8 4.8 67.6% 54.9% 33.7% 40.6% 78.6% 48.2% 41.7%
32 2022 3/3 2.7 2.7 64.0% 64.6% 38.9% 27.2% 34.9% 55.7% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 6/6 1.2 1.5 69.3% 65.6% 49.5% 45.5% 53.6% 60.6% 49.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 19/20 2.3 3.2 65.5% 60.6% 40.7% 52.1% 38.7% 53.4% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 369/387 2.3 2.6 60.1% 63.1% 46.7% 50.7% 49.1% 56.5% 44.1% — 71/103 0.8 3.0 65.1% 56.9% 46.7% 53.3% 53.8% 53.1% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Laura Pous-Tio
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1510 107.3 +0.28 -0.88 1.201 53.9% — — — 60.0% +1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1532 109.5 -0.95 -1.06 0.905 47.8% +22 -5 — 37.5% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1700 136.1 +0.52 +1.27 1.013 50.4% -18 -56 — 50.0% +0.10 10–4 (71%) 5–3 (63%) 112.0 -1.72 2005 1542 107.3 — — — — -41 +77 — 46.9% -0.56 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — -0.14
21 2011 1623 125.8 -0.67 -0.46 0.936 48.5% +20 -35 — 47.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 5–4 (56%) 93.7 -1.25 2006 1498 111.5 -0.72 -1.49 0.959 49.2% -43 +76 — 36.2% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 0–1 — -0.11
22 2012 1606 — -4.79 -0.63 0.357 26.3% — — — — — — — — -0.02 2007 1466 95.5 -3.89 -0.40 0.924 48.0% — +65 — 35.0% -0.80 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.71
23 2013 1618 108.8 -1.89 -0.55 0.931 48.2% +29 — — 44.4% -0.56 1–0 1–0 — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 1651 116.6 -0.45 +1.55 0.997 49.7% +20 -58 — 63.2% +0.10 1–2 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 103.0 +0.37 2010 1530 117.0 -0.15 +1.25 1.039 51.0% — +51 — 53.3% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.42
26 2016 1713 129.3 +0.55 -0.36 0.984 49.6% -12 -43 -134 53.9% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 104.2 -0.43 2011 1590 119.1 -2.29 +2.09 0.985 49.8% -126 +36 — 44.3% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 100.5 -0.55
27 2017 1821 142.6 +0.98 +2.00 1.060 51.3% -53 -13 -127 58.1% +0.59 9–7 (56%) 4–9 (31%) 102.4 +0.20 2012 1545 107.7 -1.22 -0.13 1.041 51.1% -104 +94 — 40.6% -0.56 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.78
28 2018 1918 151.6 +2.10 +3.32 1.125 52.4% -17 -8 -182 60.1% +0.74 17–7 (71%) 8–8 (50%) 106.2 -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1759 136.0 +1.82 +0.39 1.068 51.1% -11 +149 0 56.8% +0.43 9–13 (41%) 6–5 (55%) 93.5 +2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1649 114.7 -2.98 -3.36 0.751 43.8% +22 — — 13.6% -2.27 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.12 2015 1531 100.6 -1.68 -0.81 0.759 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.03
31 2021 1713 129.5 -0.41 +1.61 1.003 50.1% -94 +132 +101 50.0% +0.10 7–9 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 95.5 +0.39 2016 1428 94.0 -2.86 -3.40 0.805 45.3% -10 — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 — — +0.53
32 2022 1699 110.3 -1.74 +1.28 0.927 48.1% -77 — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.20 2017 1414 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1698 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1713 111.5 +0.69 +0.90 1.267 54.9% -42 — — 75.0% +1.75 — — — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1723 125.9 -2.14 -1.19 0.879 47.2% -4 +53 — 43.8% -0.58 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 104.0 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1676 90.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1956 140.5 +0.50 +0.97 1.015 50.2% -21 +17 -80 52.8% +0.18 69–60 (53%) 45–45 (50%) 104.7 -0.57 — 1621 111.6 -1.76 +0.40 0.977 49.6% -75 +62 — 41.2% -0.42 13–20 (39%) 8–15 (35%) 91.7 +0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.