H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasija Sevastova vs Madison Brengle H2H: 2-0

Anastasija Sevastova holds a 2–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2021 Yarra Valley Classic first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasija Sevastova
Latvia Age 36 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasija Sevastova #54 6-4 6-2 Madison Brengle #83 Match data Feb 2, 2021* R64 Yarra Valley Classic WTA 500 Hard
Anastasija Sevastova #11 6-3 6-4 Madison Brengle #96 Match data Mar 9, 2019* R64 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasija Sevastova #499 #11 3,366 1,956 209 178 54.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #261 1,510 0 0 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 2009 5–9 35.7% #79 1,531 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0
20 2010 22–15 59.5% #45 1,699 0 1 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2011 12–18 40.0% #98 1,622 0 1 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #184 1,605 0 1 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2013 2–2 50.0% #148 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0
25 2015 5–3 62.5% #113 1,650 0 1 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 2016 22–19 53.7% #34 1,713 0 1 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 2017 37–24 60.7% #16 1,821 0 2 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 2018 44–22 66.7% #11 1,918 0 3 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0
29 2019 27–22 55.1% #27 1,759 0 4 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 2020 1–9 10.0% #54 1,649 0 4 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0
31 2021 17–18 48.6% #70 1,712 0 4 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 2022 1–2 33.3% #680 1,699 0 4 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0
34 2024 4–2 66.7% #481 1,712 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–11 45.0% #188 1,722 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2009 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2010 11 8 19 57.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2016 10 10 20 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 15 7 22 68.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2018 26 14 40 65.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2019 10 13 23 43.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 2024 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 106 219 51.6% 73 51 124 58.9% 23 19 42 54.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 369/387 of Anastasija Sevastova's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 1.0 2.0 68.6% 61.0% 55.0% 52.2% 50.3% 59.0% 49.2% 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 2009 13/14 1.9 3.8 57.7% 60.9% 42.7% 46.5% 52.6% 53.4% 42.2% 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 2010 34/37 1.9 3.1 59.7% 61.0% 48.4% 50.1% 50.5% 56.0% 44.6% 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2011 29/30 2.6 3.0 60.2% 61.2% 43.4% 43.8% 50.6% 54.3% 42.8% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 2012 1/1 0.0 0.0 80.0% 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% — 20.0% 28.6% 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2013 4/4 5.3 6.3 52.3% 63.4% 47.3% 53.4% 39.7% 55.6% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 2015 5/8 1.8 2.4 59.9% 62.4% 47.5% 49.0% 51.4% 56.2% 43.7% 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 2016 39/41 2.1 2.6 56.4% 64.3% 45.3% 57.0% 48.6% 56.1% 43.1% 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 2017 61/61 2.1 2.3 61.2% 63.4% 47.9% 48.5% 54.1% 57.3% 45.3% 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 2018 62/66 3.0 2.2 60.8% 66.3% 47.8% 52.6% 50.3% 58.9% 46.2% 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 2019 48/49 2.5 2.0 58.8% 64.8% 50.3% 52.2% 46.3% 58.7% 44.1% 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 2020 10/10 2.4 2.3 60.0% 55.3% 43.1% 43.3% 31.6% 50.7% 37.0% 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 2021 33/35 1.9 2.8 59.4% 62.1% 46.7% 54.4% 52.0% 55.9% 44.3% 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 2022 3/3 2.7 2.7 64.0% 64.6% 38.9% 27.2% 34.9% 55.7% 41.1% 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
34 2024 6/6 1.2 1.5 69.3% 65.6% 49.5% 45.5% 53.6% 60.6% 49.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 19/20 2.3 3.2 65.5% 60.6% 40.7% 52.1% 38.7% 53.4% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 369/387 2.3 2.6 60.1% 63.1% 46.7% 50.7% 49.1% 56.5% 44.1% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1510 107.3 +0.28 -0.88 1.201 53.9% — — — 60.0% +1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.14 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40
19 2009 1532 109.5 -0.95 -1.06 0.905 47.8% +22 -5 — 37.5% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.37 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06
20 2010 1700 136.1 +0.52 +1.27 1.013 50.4% -18 -56 — 50.0% +0.10 10–4 (71%) 5–3 (63%) 112.0 -1.72 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2011 1623 125.8 -0.67 -0.46 0.936 48.5% +20 -35 — 47.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 5–4 (56%) 93.7 -1.25 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2012 1606 — -4.79 -0.63 0.357 26.3% — — — — — — — — -0.02 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2013 1618 108.8 -1.89 -0.55 0.931 48.2% +29 — — 44.4% -0.56 1–0 1–0 — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 2015 1651 116.6 -0.45 +1.55 0.997 49.7% +20 -58 — 63.2% +0.10 1–2 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 103.0 +0.37 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 2016 1713 129.3 +0.55 -0.36 0.984 49.6% -12 -43 -134 53.9% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 104.2 -0.43 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 2017 1821 142.6 +0.98 +2.00 1.060 51.3% -53 -13 -127 58.1% +0.59 9–7 (56%) 4–9 (31%) 102.4 +0.20 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74
28 2018 1918 151.6 +2.10 +3.32 1.125 52.4% -17 -8 -182 60.1% +0.74 17–7 (71%) 8–8 (50%) 106.2 -0.51 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 2019 1759 136.0 +1.82 +0.39 1.068 51.1% -11 +149 0 56.8% +0.43 9–13 (41%) 6–5 (55%) 93.5 +2.29 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29
30 2020 1649 114.7 -2.98 -3.36 0.751 43.8% +22 — — 13.6% -2.27 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.12 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 2021 1713 129.5 -0.41 +1.61 1.003 50.1% -94 +132 +101 50.0% +0.10 7–9 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 95.5 +0.39 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 2022 1699 110.3 -1.74 +1.28 0.927 48.1% -77 — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.20 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 2023 1698 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
34 2024 1713 111.5 +0.69 +0.90 1.267 54.9% -42 — — 75.0% +1.75 — — — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1723 125.9 -2.14 -1.19 0.879 47.2% -4 +53 — 43.8% -0.58 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 104.0 -0.64 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1676 90.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1956 140.5 +0.50 +0.97 1.015 50.2% -21 +17 -80 52.8% +0.18 69–60 (53%) 45–45 (50%) 104.7 -0.57 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.